ONC Posts Fridsma Bio: Acting Dir, Standards and Interoperability

Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD

Doug Fridsma, MD, PhD

Doug Fridsma, M.D., Ph.D.
Acting Director
Office of Standards and Interoperability
Excerpted from ONC site on June 16, 2010
“Dr. Fridsma is the acting director of the Office of Interoperability and Standards in the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. He is currently on leave from the Department of Biomedical Informatics at Arizona State University and from his clinical practice at Mayo Clinic Scottsdale.

“Dr. Fridsma completed his medical training at the University of Michigan in 1990, and his PhD in Biomedical Informatics from Stanford University in 2003. His research interests include the development of computational tools to study patient safety, clinical work processes, and methods to improve model-driven standards development processes. He has served on the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium (CDISC) Board of Directors from 2005-2008, and was appointed to the HIT Standards Committee in 2009. He recently resigned from the HIT SC to become the acting director of the Office of Interoperability and Standards at ONC.”
#                         #                             #

Fridsma’s responsibilities include the NHIN and NHIN Direct projects.

June 16 Webinar on HIE Multi-Party Legal Agreements/DURSA

Multi-Party Legal Agreements for Health Information Exchange
Produced by National eHealth Collaborative
June 16, 2010
       2:30 – 4:00 pm ET
Excerpted from National eHealth Collaborative site on June 16, 2010 
“NeHC is offering a Special National Health IT Week Stakeholder Forum on Multi-Party Legal Agreements for Health Information Exchange as an opportunity for all stakeholders, especially state decision makers, to understand how multi-party legal agreements can be effective for data-sharing at the state level.

Trust Framework

Trust Framework

 

“This session is intended to provide decision makers and others with a foundational legal concept for understanding potential applications of multi-party data-sharing agreements. The Data Use and Reciprocal Services Agreement (DURSA) used by the NHIN Exchange will be presented as a case study in the development of multi-party agreements and participants will learn about those aspects of the DURSA that may be applicable to state level agreements.

“Experts from the ONC Office of Policy and Planning and the ONC Office of State and Community Programs, as well as the State-Level HIE Project led by the AHIMA Foundation (technical assistance provider to state HIE grantees), will be on hand to answer questions from stakeholders and participate in the discussion.

“LEARNING OBJECTIVES: By participating in this Stakeholder Forum, participants will:

    Learn about the pros and cons of multi-party legal data-sharing agreements for health information exchange

  • Learn about aspects of the DURSA that may impact HIE development for states
  • Take away information that will inform state-level plans to consider participation in interstate HIE or the NHIN Exchange”

To register, please go to NeHC site.

Blumenthal blogs on “Adoption of Health IT”

Health IT Buzz Blog:  Adoption of Health IT
Monday, June 14th, 2010 | Originally posted by Dr. David Blumenthal on ONC’s Health IT Buzz Blog and republished here.

Introducing change in health care is never easy. Historically, adopting our most fundamental medical technologies, from the stethoscope to the x-ray, were met with significant doubt and opposition. So it comes as no surprise that in the face of change as transformational as the adoption of health IT – even though it carries the promise of vastly improving the nation’s health care – some hospitals and providers push back. I resisted using EHRs while an internist in Boston, as I wrote in my blog, “Why Be a Meaningful User.” Over time, however, I found that working with health IT made me a better and safer physician. Most importantly, my patients received better, safer care and improved outcomes.

There are thousands of stories like mine across the nation. The question health care providers are facing today is whether we are pushing too hard, too fast to make this important change. I respectfully submit, no. In turn, I ask, “Can we make these changes expeditiously enough?”

Americans deserve better health care than they are currently receiving, and they need it delivered more efficiently. Every provider, every patient throughout our nation will benefit from the goals envisioned by the HITECH Act. Yes, this will be a challenge. While large hospital networks and smaller providers may be stretched to meet national health IT goals, it is not beyond their capacity for growth.

Doctors and hospitals will not have to go it alone. Programs, such as our 60 Regional Extension Centers located throughout the United States, are working hard to ensure that providers have all the necessary resources to meet the challenge. The incentive program will then provide reimbursement to providers who have achieved meaningful use.

This is the time to realize the promise of health IT. Information technology has improved every aspect of our lives, we need to channel information technology to improve our health and care. Providing patients with improved quality and safety, more efficient care and better outcomes is paramount. Physicians who adhere to the oath of Hippocrates believe we must act with all deliberate haste. More than two thousand years later, we can’t forestall health care quality improvements, not when so many patients entrust their providers for the best care they can possibly deliver. As the saying goes, “If not now, when?”

I welcome your comments, and ask you to share your stories on how health IT has changed your practice.
To comment directly on the Health IT Buzz Blog, click here.

Hello Congress: It’s National Health IT Week and We Ask 3 Things

HIMSS Members from Across Nation Go to DC
for Fifth Annual National IT Week  
Plus  ”The Three Asks”
Washington, DC will see members of Health Information Management Systems Society (HIMSS) chapters from across the country and related organization members go to Capitol Hall to make three requests, known as “Asks” in shorthand of Capitolese.

One Voice, One Vision: Transforming Health and Care
According to HIMSS Web site“National Health IT Week is a collaborative forum, now in its fifth year, of assembling key healthcare constituents—vendors, provider organizations, payers, pharmaceutical/biotech companies, government agencies, industry/professional associations, research foundations, and consumer protection groups—working together to elevate national attention to the necessity of advancing health IT.”

HIMSS Three Asks For 2010
These are the three requests members of HIMSS will be requesting from Senators, Congressmen and women, and their staff members. These three links go to PDF files:

For a complete schedule of National Health IT Week: June 14-19, 2010, click here.

SCHEDULE IN BRIEF
JUNE  14: Capitol Hill Briefing on Patients & Technology
eHealth Initiative:  ”The eHealth Initiative is actively working to ensure patient engagement and access to information is viewed as an integral part of the health information technology movement. This eHealth Initiative briefing will feature perspectives from Congress, Federal Agencies, Patients, and Industry Stakeholders.

“The session will address the strategies, challenges, and successes related to engaging patients in their health care through the use of technology.”

Featured Speaker: U.S. Congressman Michael C. Burgess, MD
Additional Speakers Include:

  • Joshua Seidman, PhD, Acting Director of Meaningful Use Division, Office of Provider Adoption Support, Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT
  • Rushika Fernandopulle, MD, MPP, Co-Founder of Renaissance Health, Ix Center for Information Therapy, Practicing Physician
  • Kate Christensen, MD, Medical Director of Internet Services Group, Kaiser Permanente
  • Paul Berger, Stroke Survivor, ePatient

JUNE 14: HIMSS Federal Health Community
Invitation only event for federal stakeholders to tour George Washington University Hospital’s electronic health record implementation.

JUNE 15: NHIT Week 2010 Partners
Press Conference on Capitol Hill, House Triangle in front of Capitol

JUNE 15-16: Government Health IT Conference & Exhibition
Registration Required.

JUNE 16: CHIME StateNet and ALT Policy Briefing
College of Healthcare Information Management Executives (CHIME)
ONC’s Dr. Farzad Mostashari, Deputy National Coordinator for Policy and Programs will speak. Discussion of ”how CIOs are organizing and sharing information to leverage HITECH funding at the state-level.” Open only to CHIME members, StateNet CIO Coordinators, StateNet CIO participants, ALT members (and invited c-suite colleagues). Registration required.

JUNE 16National eHealth Collaborative Stakeholder Forum – Legal Agreements for Health Information Exchange: What is the Right Model for My State?
NeHC is offering a Special National Health IT Week Stakeholder Forum on Multi-Party Legal Agreements for Health Information Exchange as an opportunity for all stakeholders, especially state decision makers, to understand how multi-party legal agreements can be effective for data-sharing at the state level.

“This session is intended to provide decision makers and others with a foundational legal concept for understanding potential applications of multi-party data-sharing agreements. The Data Use and Reciprocal Services Agreement (DURSA) used by the NHIN Exchange will be presented as a case study in the development of multi-party agreements and participants will learn about those aspects of the DURSA that may be applicable to state level agreements.”

Open to the public. Participate online.

JUNE 16-17: HIMSS 10th Annual Policy Summit

“The HIMSS 10th Annual Policy Summit highlights keynote speeches and roundtable discussions from key decision-makers with their finger on the pulse of Capitol Hill and the White House.” Registration Required.

June 17: NHIT Week 2010 Partners Networking ReceptionProduced by eHealth Policy and CHIME. See http://www.e-healthpolicy.org/
for more information.

June 17: Capitol Hill Steering Committee on Telehealth and Healthcare Informatics’ Technology Showcase

Calling all HIEs–Nat’l, Reg’l, State, Community–eHi 2010 Survey Deadline Jun 24

June 24 Deadline for eHealth Initiative 2010 Annual Survey on Health Information Exchange
2010 Annual Survey Results Posted
eHealth Initiative survey deadlines June 24, 2010 and  is “designed to capture health information exchange activities across the country and the results will be used to identify trends, inform policy, and support the forward movement of HIE.” Results will be released at eHealth Initiative’s National Forum on Health Information Exchange on July 22, 2010 in Washington, DC.

Per eHi Web site: “Any groups engaged in health information exchange are invited to participate.”

Here’s eHI’s detailed listing of groups who should complete the survey.
“You should complete this survey,
– if your organization is planning for health information exchange at the national, regional, state, or community level; OR
– building or maintaining a technical infrastructure to support health information exchange; OR
– federally funded as a state designated entity; OR
– facilitating the exchange of data between at least two different stakeholders, such as a hospital and physician practice; OR —not directly involved in building a technical infrastructure, but coordinating or creating policy to facilitate health information exchange.”

SURVEY COMPLETED
See eHI Survey site for complete information.
Click here to complete the survey

http://www.surveymonkey.com/s/ehi2010hiesurvey

Results of 2009 eHi Survey

Thirty-two State Health Information Exchange Plans For ONC: New York Added to Directory

HIE Plans from Alabama, Arkansas, California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington, Wisconsin
Updated November 21, 2010. New York submitted its operational plan to ONC on October 26, 2010. Indiana and Kansas State HIE Strategic and Operational Plans were submitted to ONC on August 31, 2010.  Listed below are thirty-two State HIE Strategic and Operational Plans developed for submission to Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT. List includes New Mexico, Maryland, Maine, and Utah Strategic and Operational Plans that have already been approved by ONC. Reportedly two additional unnamed state plans have been approved by ONC but not yet officially announced. Some versions of the plans below are drafts, have not yet have been submitted to ONC, and may be under state review prior to submission. Some of the dates by each listing below and on the linked documents may refer to a date of expected submission to ONC and not to the date of the actual version. All the documents were compiled from publicly available Web sites. For a previous post on approved plans, see e-Healthcare Marketing. 

Please send links to additional published State HIE Strategic and Operational Plans to e-Healthcare Marketing for posting, using either the comments box or emailing to e-Healthcare Marketing producer listed in About me section.

Links to PDFs of State HIE Strategic and/or Operational Plans with Dates
Alabama Strategic Plan 5/7/2010
Arkansas Strategic Plan Draft 7/30/2010
California Strategic and Operational Plan 4/6/2010
          CA eHealth Operational Plan
          CA eHealth Strategic Plan
          Appendices 1-8
          Appendices 9-15
          Appendices 16-19
          Appendix 20
          Appendices 21-22

Connecticut Strategic Plan 6/10/2010
Florida Executive Summary Only (2 pages) 5/23/21010
Illinois Strategic Plan  (7/30/2010)
Illinois Strategic Plan Appendix (7/30/2010)
Indiana Strategic and Operational Plan 8/31/2010
Iowa Strategic and Operational Plan 5/2010
Kansas Strategic and Operational Plan 8/31/2010
Louisiana Strategic and Operational Plan 8/2010
Maine Strategic and Operational Plan 6/18/2010 Approved by ONC
Maine HIE Project Plan 2010-2014 3/29/2010
Maryland Strategic and Operational Plan 6/9/2010 Approved by ONC
Massachusetts Strategic Plan 4/15/2010 (unclear if this is ONC-submission)
Massachusetts Strategic and Operational Plan (8/30/2010) Subnitted to ONC.
Michigan Strategic Plan 4/30/2010
Michigan Operational Plan 4/30/2010
Minnesota Strategic Plan 5/17/2010
Minnesota Operational Plan 5/21/2010
Missouri Strategic Plan 3/17/2010
Missouri Operational Plan 6/8/2010
Nebraska Strategic Plan 4/20/2010
Nebraska Operational Plan 4/20/2010
New Hampshire Strategic and Operational Plan (Draft) 8/6/2010
New Jersey Operational Plan 8/13/2010
New Mexico Strategic and Operational Plan 3/24/2010 Approved by ONC
New York Operational Plan 10/26/2010 Submitted to ONC
North Carolina Strategic Plan  Updated and resubmitted to ONC 10/25/2010
North Carolina Operational Plan Submitted to ONC  8/31/2010; Revised 10/25/2010 re: structured lab results.
Oregon Strategic Plan Submitted to ONC 8/23/2010
Oregon Operational Plan Submitted to ONC 8/23/2010
Pennsylvania Strategic Plan 3/2010
Rhode Island Strategic Plan Executive Summary 5/28/2010
South Carolina Strategic Plan 4/20/2010
South Carolina Operational Plan 7/29/2010
Tennessee Strategic Plan 6/7/2010
Tennessee Operational Plan 6/7/2010
Texas Strategic and Operational Plans (Staff Draft) 8/25/2010
Utah Strategic Plan  3/2010 Approved by ONC
Utah Operational Plan 3/2010 Approved by ONC
Virginia Strategic Plan 7/30/2010
Washington State Strategic and Operational Plan 7/6/2010
Wisconsin Strategic and Operational Plan 7/16/2010
Wisconsin Strategic and Operational Plan Appendices 7/16/2010

ONC Shares Approved HIE Plans for Maryland, Utah, and New Mexico

State HIE Toolkit Posts Approved HIE Plans for Maryland, Utah, and New Mexico
On June 10, 2010 the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC) for Health IT posted the approved Strategic and Operational Plan for the Maryland Health Information Exchange (HIE) on the  State HIE Toolkit.  Maryland’s plan was added to ONC-approved plans already posted for Utah and New Mexico.

Maryland Strategic And Operational Plan (pdf)

Utah Strategic Plan (pdf)
Utah Operational Plan (pdf)

New Mexico Operational Plan (pdf)

iHealthBeat.org compiled a roundup of articles about the three state programs on June 11, 2010.

Jennifer Lubell, HITS staff writer for ModernHealthcare.com reported on the Maryland and New Mexico plans on June 11, 2010. 

CMS: Final HIT rules moving from late spring to early summer?

NYTimes: Doctors and Hospitals Say Goals on Computerized Records Are Unrealistic; “Early summer” is the real story
“Final rules will be out in early summer,” according to Jonathan D. Blum, deputy administrator of the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, as quoted in Robert Pear’s June 8, 2010 story in the New York Times, “Doctors and Hospitals Say Goals on Computerized Records Are Unrealistic.”

For several months, National Coordinator for Healthcare IT David Blumenthal has been saying that the final rules for certification of EHR systems (from ONC) and the final EHR incentives (from CMS) would come out in “late spring” 2010, which means prior to June 21. ONC and CMS have been working closely together on these two rules.

The quote by the deputy administrator of CMS appears to be setting the stage for finalization of rules to come June 21 (first day of summer) or later. Perhaps this New York Times story is actually setting the stage for some more flexibility in the final definitions and timing of “meaningful use” requirements.  Folks from Intermountain, Kaiser, and Partners Healthcare System in Boston, are quoted as saying too much change is expected in too short a time, and these are people who are way ahead of the curve.

VA Announces $80 Mil Competition for Health IT and Other Innovations

Telehealth Included in at least Two Areas of
VA Innovation Initiative (VAi2)
Mary Mosquera of Government HealthIT reported on  June 08, 2010 “The Veterans Affairs Department will make $80 million available to test technology applications developed through a competition to find innovative solutions to VA’s most pressing healthcare challenges, including homelessness, expanding online healthcare and strategies for treating kidney disease on an outpatient basis.”
VAi2

VA Announces Industry Innovation Competition
$80 Million Available for Private Sector Innovations
 
June 7, 2010  VA Press Release excerpted:

WASHINGTON – Secretary of Veterans Affairs Eric K. Shinseki announced today the opening of the Industry Innovation Competition by the Department of Veterans Affairs, the most recent effort under the VA Innovation Initiative.  With this competition, VA seeks the best ideas from the private sector to address the department’s most important challenges.

“At VA, we are continually looking for new ways to improve the care and services we deliver,” said Secretary Shinseki. “Engaging the private sector to tap its expertise and find ways to leverage private-sector innovations, we can improve the quality, access and transparency in service to our Nation’s Veterans.”  

The VA Innovation Initiative (VAi2) is a department-wide program that brings the most promising innovations to VA’s most important challenges by involving employees and the private sector in the creation of visionary solutions in service to Veterans 

Innovation is more than simply a collection of ideas,” said Jared Cohon, president of Carnegie Mellon University. “It requires close collaboration between academia, industry and government to produce solutions that make a meaningful impact on society.  VAi2’s programs bring about exactly that kind of fruitful collaboration.”

“Creativity in the private sector generates a wealth of technology capability that can help drive VA forward,” said Dr. Peter Levin, senior advisor to the secretary and VA’s chief technology officer. “By targeting innovations that are nearing commercialization, the Industry Innovation Competition provides a bridge between creative ideas in the private sector and real-world deployments that improve the services we deliver.”  

Public and private companies, entrepreneurs, universities and non-profits are encouraged to participate in the competition… 
#                    #                       #

Department of Veterans Affairs Innovation Initiative (VAi2)
Industry Innovation Competition (Industry-IC)
Solicitation Number: VA118-10-RP-0418
 
Excerpts from FedBizOpps.Gov VAi2 Solicitation as of June 10, 2010:

This Broad Agency Announcement (BAA), solicitation number VA118-10-RP-0418, sponsored by the Veterans Affairs Innovation Initiative (VAi2) will provide support to the VAi2 Industry Innovation Competition (Industry-IC).  The Industry-IC invites private sector companies, entrepreneurs and academic leaders to contribute ideas for innovations that increase Veteran access to VA services, reduce or control costs of delivering those services, enhance the performance of VA operations and improve the quality of service that Veterans and their families receive. Specifically, the proposed effort supports the acquisition of solutions submitted by industry in response to VAi2 solicitations. Note:  In order to conduct business with the Government, contractors must be registered in the Central Contractor Registration (CCR) database.

It is anticipated that proposals submitted in response to this BAA shall fit into one or both of the following phases. Offerors shall indicate which phase applies to their submission, or that it is a combination proposal.  

Development Proposals: New and untested ideas and technologies or novel customization and application of existing technologies with the potential to provide benefits outweighing all costs and which provide results that significantly exceed currently deployed solutions. Technologies and products submitted as Development Proposals shall achieve a working prototype or test system preferably within one year but preferably within two years.

Field Test Proposals: Products and solutions that have demonstrated significant value in commercial or other production environments but are new to the operating environment within Veterans Affairs. Solutions shall be repeatable and ready for small-scale deployment at the regional or VISN level. Should the results from small-scale deployment prove favorable, the solution shall be scalable to a VA-wide implementation. It is anticipated that this BAA fund the small-scale field testing. 

The VA is looking for solutions which can be implemented and impact to the VA realized within a 12-24 months timeframe. 

An industry day is scheduled via Webinar on June 16 2010.  Information will be provided for each area of interest and questions from industry will be addressed. As it becomes available, additional Webinar information will be posted at http://www.fbo.gov/ and www.va.gov/vai2 

Topic Number:  0002
Topic Title: Telehealth
Topic Detail: Broadly defined, Telehealth includes a wide range of technologies and solutions that connect caregivers and patients and improve the ability to prevent, diagnose and monitor health conditions, to manage treatments and to enable communication and intervention when required. Telehealth solutions can provide mobile caregivers with greater flexibility, allowing them to spend more time interacting with patients. Access to healthcare services can be enhanced for rural patients or for patients for whom travel to hospitals is difficult. Frequently, these services can improve the quality of care while lowering costs. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs has been a leader in the deployment of Telehealth solutions for some time, and currently reaches thousands of veterans through services such as home health monitoring (see www.carecoordination.va.gov/telehealth for more information). 

VA is interested in solutions that significantly extend and improve our ability to provide the right treatment in the right place at the right time, using technologies such as, but not limited to:  

  • Wireless communications
  • Videoconferencing
  • Imaging
  • Remote sensing & monitoring
  • Portable or wearable sensors
  • Mobile devices
  • Web-based services and patient portals
  • Human factors, ergonomic and usability design
  • Process and workflow design

Potential applications for Telehealth solutions are broad and varied, and we encourage the submission of proposals that have significant impact on the quality, access, cost and performance of the healthcare delivered to veterans. Example applications include, but are not limited to:  

  • Home Monitoring for Chronic Care: The ability to monitor patient vital statistics from a distance has existed for many years and has improved chronic care and disease management. However, the needs and expectations of both patients and caregivers continue to evolve, and Telehealth technology must evolve beyond the recording and reporting of key statistics. Functions such as real-time, two-way communication between patients and all members of the care team; self-management tools allowing patients to take an active role in their care, continuous, real-time and/or unobtrusive sensing & monitoring; delivery of educational content, integration of wireless mobile devices with Telehealth delivery and more can significantly extend the reach and scope of Telehealth services in the home environment.
     
  • Home Monitoring for Severe or Challenging Disabilities: Veterans with severe disabilities may have care that is managed at home, but may further benefit from specialist recommendations for environmental modifications or other quality-of-life improvements based on continual home monitoring. Also, certain injuries (such as Traumatic Brain Injuries) and conditions (such as mental health) are difficult to diagnose and monitor through the measurement and analysis of traditional vital statistics. Long-term monitoring of diverse symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, memory function, depression, irritability, anxiety, etc. may be required. Changes in symptoms based on social environment such as family interaction and community involvement, or based on types & levels of activities such as physical exercise, home management, child rearing, work and recreation may be important to monitor. As a special case of Home Monitoring, solutions that involve creative methods to capture, record and communicate these kinds of difficult-to-capture symptoms are of interest.
     
  • Home Monitoring for Acute Care: Acute hospital care may not always be the best solution for many patients. Factors from risk of additional infection to the emotional benefits of being in a familiar environment may make home-based care a preferred option. Home monitoring capabilities are a crucial part of enabling such options. Hospital@Home is an innovative approach that VA has employed for a number of years to provide hospital-like services to patients in their homes for such conditions as acute heart failure, pneumonia, and other conditions that can safely be managed at home with intensive support of a physician, nursing, and home infusion capability.  Also, similar capabilities exist to remotely monitor patients in Intensive Care Unit settings. VA is interested innovative approaches that allow for the remote monitoring, in the home environment, of patients’ vital signs and that enable visual interaction between patients and caregivers.  Proposed solutions must be capable of storing information in VA electronic medical records.  
     
  • Mobile Support for VA Preventive Care Coordinators: Preventive Care coordinators can improve care and reduce costs by serving multiple veterans outside of the hospital environment, capturing and reporting relevant data and interacting with patients to monitor overall well-being. However, a substantial amount of caregiver time involves routine data collection and recording, leaving less time for valuable patient interaction. Solutions that provide a capability to capture vital statistics and quickly transfer them to the Care Coordinator can significantly impact the quality of interaction between the Care Coordinator and the patient.  As an illustrative example, a vest containing relevant sensors and monitors might capture vital statistics upon or prior to Care Coordinator arrival and transmit data to a mobile device carried by the Coordinator. 
     
  • VA has offered patients group visits (Doctor Interactive Group Medical Appointments – DIGMA) for almost 10 years.  These group interactions with healthcare providers optimize care for patients with similar chronic conditions, such as diabetes, and foster an environment where patients can coach and mutually support each other in the management of their chronic disease.  VA would like to explore virtual options to provide a similar environment for patients that cannot or choose not to travel for such care.  These solutions may employ social networking tools that would allow patients to drop-in to a virtual group visit in a secure environment.  These solutions should allow for the capture of some information into VA’s electronic medical record, such as patient documentation and the collection of health information relevant to the encounter.
     
  • Online Care: Veterans currently have access to online services through My HealtheVet (www.myhealth.va.gov ), where they can access trusted, secure and current health and benefits information and may be able to access Personal Health Records and functions such as prescription refill. However, web-based technology offers the opportunity to provide significant new services such as real-time interaction with caregivers via video, text chat and/or telephone. VA wishes to explore options that would allow for either synchronous or asynchronous communication between patients and clinicians or administrative staff, in ways that protect patient confidentiality and privacy. Where possible, integration of new online services with the existing MyHealtheVet should be considered. It should be noted that VA has some experience with providing online services, such as video monitoring, on a small scale. Therefore, proposals that demonstrate point solutions via individual prototypes may not be as valuable as proposals that involve fully integrated solutions and scalable platforms.
     
  • Communication Tools that allow Clinician-to-Clinician interaction:  VA has an advanced electronic health record, but lacks tools that improve clinician to clinician communication, particularly over significant distances.  VA would like to provide the capability to staff to be able to communicate with each other about sensitive patient care information in a secure environment that protects patient confidentiality and privacy.  These tools might provide either synchronous or asynchronous capability to request urgent help with patient care issues or to communicate more routine information that might not otherwise specifically be in the medical record.  For example, such a tool might be used by a physician in an acute care setting (hospital or emergency room) to communicate with the patient’s primary care team, notifying them of the visit or discharge, with specific concerns or follow up requirements.  Ideally, this tool could be used by both VA staff as well as clinicians outside of VA to communicate with VA staff.  These tools should ideally fit into the normal work flow of VA staff (possibly from within the VA electronic medical record).

Topic Number:  0003
Topic Title: Expansion of Polytrauma Rehabilitation Services
Topic Detail: Rehabilitation services encompass a broad range of therapies and treatments which provide maximum reduction of physical or mental disability and restoration of a patient to their optimal functional level.  Service delivery models vary by range of providers and environments of care, which include but are not limited to provider offices, freestanding outpatient clinics, medical centers, nursing homes, patient homes, and may involve remote/Telehealth interventions.  Regardless of provider type or treatment setting, an effective individualized rehabilitation plan, developed following a comprehensive evaluation, can help patients restore function and cope with deficits that have not otherwise been reversed by medical care. 

The Department of Veterans Affairs has been a leader in the provision of rehabilitation services across multiple spectrums of care.  Rehabilitation services provide the core disciplines in the Polytrauma System of Care (see www.polytrauma.va.gov) which was established to provide specialized comprehensive inter-disciplinary rehabilitation care to veterans and returning service members with polytraumatic injuries. 

VA is interested in technological solutions that assist in the provision of evidence based practice through enhanced access to treatment algorithms and the expansion of remote assistive technology monitoring services, regardless of treatment location.  This effort will help to bridge geographic distances and improve our ability to provide the right treatment in the right place at the right time.  For these efforts, we are interested in using technologies such as, but not limited to: 

Portable interfaces to computerized medical records 

  • Real time bi-directional data exchange
  • Interactive/responsive programming to user entries
  • Wireless communications
  • Videoconferencing
  • Remote sensing & monitoring
  • Portable or wearable sensors
  • Mobile devices
  • Web-based services and patient portals
  • Human factors, ergonomic and usability design
  • Process and workflow design

 Potential applications for rehabilitation services are broad and varied, and we encourage the submission of proposals that have significant impact on the quality, access, cost and performance of the health care delivered to veterans. Example applications include, but are not limited to:  

  • Dynamic Treatment Algorithms: Collaboration among VA, Department of Defense, and private sector has expanded the availability of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in rehabilitation focused treatment areas which include but are not limited to mild TBI, low back pain, cerebrovascular accidents, dysphagia, and amputation.  Provider utilization of these clinical practice guidelines/decision trees for emerging areas of practice through technology based interfaces is still not maximized.  Technology should be sensitive and responsive to the actions of the providers such that treatment recommendations and contraindications are provided, practice patterns are captured and monitored, and outcomes are stored for analysis.  The expansion of this monitoring should include not only the immediate clinical setting, but may also extend to the patients home for regular follow up.   Consideration should be given to provider collaboration and outreach in dealing with complex cases through technological solutions which permit real time exchange of data between multiple locations working on the same evaluation; interaction between patient (self completed surveys), and multiple providers; and documentation/storage of the results in a central location.  Consideration should also be given to self-management tools which would allow patients to take an active role in their care and delivery of appropriate educational content based on patient feedback/status. 
     
  • Home Monitoring for severe or challenging disabilities: Veterans with severe disabilities may have care that is managed at home, but may further benefit from specialist recommendations for environmental modifications or other quality-of-life improvements based on continual home monitoring. Also, certain injuries (such as Traumatic Brain Injuries) and conditions (such as mental health) are difficult to diagnose and monitor through the measurement and analysis of traditional vital statistics. Long-term monitoring of diverse symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, memory function, depression, irritability, anxiety, etc. may be required. Changes in symptoms based on social environment such as family interaction and community involvement, or based on types & levels of activities such as physical exercise, home management, child rearing, work and recreation may be important to monitor. As a special case of Home Monitoring, solutions that involve creative methods to capture, record and communicate these kinds of difficult-to-capture symptoms are of interest.
     
  • Symptom-Based Medication Guidance: The prevalence of patients with symptoms related to TBI has led to increased research and collaboration on developing treatment recommendations for patients who may have experienced a mild, moderate or severe TBI.  Medication recommendations based on reported symptoms are available, and technology can enhance the communication of these recommendations and their utilization by providers caring for these patients.  This technology should be mobile, dynamic, and reactive based on changes in patient status and provider entries.  Solutions should be able to store, analyze and respond to data entered into the system, alerting providers to any potential recommendations or contraindications.  Consideration should also be given to provider collaboration and outreach in dealing with complex cases through technological solutions which permit real time exchange of data between multiple locations working on the same evaluation; interaction between patient (self completed surveys), and multiple providers; and documentation/storage of the results in a central location.  Expansion of technological solutions in this area will assist in improving care and reducing costs through remote patient interactions and adherence to evidence based practice.    
     
  • Assistive Technology (AT):  Veterans are currently provided with a variety of assistive technology devices, including augmentative communication devices, environmental control units, cognitive devices, specialized mobility devices, etc.  Initial evaluation and training occurs at the prescribing clinic.  Often training needs change or do not become apparent until this technology is used in the home for a period of time.  VA is interested in mechanisms to monitor use, provide ongoing follow-up and training, and further evaluate the AT needs of Veterans remotely in their homes.  Consideration should also be given to provider collaboration and outreach in dealing with complex cases through technological solutions which permit real time exchange of data between multiple locations working on the same evaluation; interaction between patient (self completed surveys), and multiple providers; and documentation/storage of the results in a central location. 

ADDITIONAL TOPICS
Topic Number
:  0001
Topic Title: Addressing Veteran Homelessness via Innovative Housing Technology 

Topic Number:  0004
Topic Title: Adverse Drug Event Trigger Tool:  Reducing Adverse Drug Events for our Nation’s Veterans 

Topic Number:  0005
Topic Title: Integrated Business Accelerator 

Topic Number:  0006
Topic Title: Dialysis & Kidney Replacement

ONC Forms New Privacy & Security Tiger Team

New Privacy & Security Tiger Team formed
Meets June 10-11, 2010:
Initial Focus on NHIN Direct Message Handling Process

Emailed notice from Office of Nat’l Coordinator for Health IT
June 9, 2010
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has organized a workgroup (subcommittee) under the auspices of the HIT Policy Committee to move forward on a range of privacy and security issues.”

“A new Privacy & Security Tiger Team (comprised of members from the HIT Policy Committee and the HIT Standards Committee as well as National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics) will work over the next few months to address the requirements of HITECH and the needs of many new organizations created under that law.”

“This workgroup is chaired” by Deven McGraw, Center for Democracy & Technology; and co-chaired byPaul Egerman. ”We expect the work of the Tiger Team to be completed by late fall 2010.” (Chair names corrected per ONC site.)

“Please note the workgroup will meet tomorrow (6/10) and Friday (6/11). Visit the ONC website at http://healthit.hhs.gov/facas for a P&S Tiger Team Member List and dates/times for public participation info for the meetings. ”
#              #             #

Howard Anderson, Managing Editor of HealthcareInfoSecurity.com, reported on June 9, 2010, in a story headlined “New Advisory Group Will Focus on Data Exchange Policies,” that the initial plan is for the group to take a narrow focus and complete it by the end of the summer, unless its mission is extended. Anderson provides a good overview.

HIT Policy Committee
Privacy & Security Tiger Team Members

  • Deven McGraw, Center for Democracy & Technology, Co-Chair
  • Paul Egerman, Co-Chair
  • Dixie Baker, SAIC
  • Christine Bechtel, National Partnership for Women & Families
  • Rachel Block, NYS Department of Health
  • Neil Calman, The Institute for Family Health
  • Carol Diamond, Markle Foundation
  • Judy Faulkner, EPIC Systems Corp.
  • Gayle Harrell, Consumer Representative/Florida
  • John Houston, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; NCVHS
  • David Lansky, Pacific Business Group on Health
  • David McCallie, Cerner Corp.
  • Wes Rishel, Gartner
  • Micky Tripathi, Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative
  • Latanya Sweeney, Carnegie Mellon University
Upcoming Meetings: June 10 and 11, 2010

June 10, 2010 – 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m.
Agenda [PDF - 19 KB]
NHIN POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY FRAMEWORK [PDF - 124 KB]

2:00 p.m.
Call to Order – Judy Sparrow, ONC
2:05 p.m. Introductions & Overview of Agenda [Primary Issue: NHIN Direct Message Handling Policy]
Deven McGraw, Chair
–Paul Egerman, Co-Chair

2:15 p.m. Level of Policy Recommendations – Deven McGraw
2:30 p.m. Overarching Issues Raised by NHIN Direct – Paul Egerman  -
–Centralization/Decentralization Issue
–Degree of PHI Exposure
–Policies with Respect to HISPs
–Granularity of Responsibility—entity vs. individual clinician – Deven McGraw
3:30 p.m. Frameworks Discussion – Deven McGraw
3:45 p.m. Public Comment
4:00 p.m. Adjourn

NOTE: Link to NCVHS sensitive data hearing
http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/100615ag.htm

June 11, 2010 – 10:30 a.m. to 2:00 p.m./ET
Agenda [PDF - 13 KB]
Point to Point Exchange Risk Levels [PDF]
10:30 a.m. Call to Order – Judy Sparrow, ONC
10:35 a.m. Review of Agenda – Deven McGraw and Paul Egerman
10:45 a.m. Overview of NHIN Exchange – ONC
11:00 a.m. Continued Discussion of Message Handling Policy Issues, con’t Paul Egerman
1:00 p.m. Frameworks Discussion, con’t – Deven McGraw
1:45 p.m. Public Comment
2:00 p.m. Adjourn

NHIN POLICY AND TECHNOLOGY FRAMEWORK [PDF – 124 KB
Policy  Principles
1. Individual Access
2. Correction
3. Openness and Transparency
4. Individual choice
5. Collection, Use and Disclosure Limitation
6. Data Integrity and Quality
7. Safeguards
8. Accountability

Technology Principles
1. Keep it simple
2. Keep the implementation cost as low as possible
3. Donʼt let “perfect” be the enemy of “good enough”
4. Design for the little guy
5. Do not try to create a one-size-fits-all standard
6. Separate content and transmission standards.
7. Create publicly available vocabularies & code sets
8. Leverage the web for transport (“health internet”).
9. Position quality measures so they motivate standards adoption.
10. Support implementers

To participate:
Via Webcast
Audio:
You may listen in via computer or telephone.

  • US toll free:   1-877-705-2976
  • International Direct:  1-201-689-8798