Virginia Announces Creation of Health IT Advisory Commission

Virginia Announces Creation of Health IT Advisory Commission
Announcement from Commonwealth of Virginia on October 13, 2009: “Governor Timothy M. Kaine today announced the creation of the Health Information Technology Advisory Commission by Executive Order 95. The Commission, which will be chaired by Secretary of Health and Human Resources Marilyn Tavenner, is charged with ensuring broad stakeholder engagement and providing guidance to the Governor on the most effective use of American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) funds designated for Health Information Technology.”

Department of Health, named as lead Virginia agency for Health IT, is setting up an Office of Health IT. “The Commission will enlist a broad range of (24) stakeholders including physicians, HIE and privacy experts and hospital and insurance executives.”

Virginia Executive Order 95 (2009): Establishing the Health Information Technology Advisory Commission

Oct 13 FAQ Updates for State HIE Cooperative Agreement by ONC

ONC Updates FAQs on HIE Cooperative Agreement
Frequently Asked Questions Updated as of October 13, 2009

Application FAQs were updated on Oct 13, 2009, and Funding FAQs were updated Oct 9, 2009. ONC encourages users to check its site frequently for updates.
Main HIE Cooperative Agreement FAQ page
          Background FAQs Updated 10/5/09
          Application FAQs Updated 10/13/09
          Funding FAQs Updated 10/9/09
          Award Administration FAQs Updated 10/5/09

Many of the latest additions to the FAQs appear to involve the nitty-gritty of  uploading the documents via Grants.gov, including a size limit of 250 megabytes for the TOTAL PACKAGE and formatting concerns. It also appears, with the deadline looming on Friday, October 16, 2009  (5:00PM SET), applicants are recognizing gaps in their plans, timing, and compliance issues. The FAQs work to identify and answer these questions with specific directions.

Please check the ONC pages for the full HIE Agreement FAQs.

University of Central Florida: Regional Extension Center Applicant

University of Central Florida College of Medicine seeks stimulus money for medical records
In the first story I’ve seen published on an applicant who received preliminary approval from ONC to be a regional extension center, Fernando Quintero, Orlando Sentinel, reported on October 12, 2009, that the College of Medicine of University of Central Florida has been asked to file a full application by November 3, 2009 in the first of three waves. According to the story, UCF will be eligible for an $8,000,000 grant which is the about the average grant amount expected to be awarded.

In a strong approach to demonstrating stakeholder support, UCF is working to obtain 1,200 letters of support from medical providers by October 27, 2009. Jeannette Schrieber, associate dean of special projects at UCF said “”Our biggest challenge now is to get our local doctors on board with this and build their trust.”

Recent post on e-Healthcare Marketing about update of FAQs on Regional Extension Centers grants program submissions.

If you come across any other published stories on preliminary approval for regional extension centers, please let me know via comments or emailing me at address in “About” link. Thank you.

Aetna, Blue Cross & Blue Shield, UnitedHealthcare sharing patient data in CT

Aetna, UnitedHealthcare, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Connecticut, ConnectiCare, Health Net of the Northeast
to provide patient data for health information exchange
Greg Bordonaro of Hartford Business reported October 12, 2009, “Five of the state’s largest health
insurance companies and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) have begun to aggregate some of their patient data and share it with Connecticut physicians as part of a new venture that aims to improve quality care in the state.”

The Connecticut Health Quality Cooperative with these insurance companies was formed by eHealth Connecticut, which was designated a Chartered Value Exchange by AHRQ in 2008. CHQC, according to an eHealth Connecticut presentation given at New England HIMSS Public Policy Forum in May 2009,  was setup to “Provide physicians with aggregated and standardized performance data to improve quality and efficiency of care for all patients.”  Per that presentation,claims-based measures from Medicare and health plan HEDIS to be used include:  Diabetes tests (A1c, Lipid, eye exams),  CAD/HTN (Lipid), Prevention (mammography, PAP); Asthma (medications), and Efficiency (Rx/tests for children with URIs or pharyngitis, respectively.)

Presentations at New England HIMSS Public Policy Forum, May 2009
4th Annual Public Policy Forum: “The Perfect Storm for Healthcare Reform” Download Library

eHealth Connecticut: “Statewide Health Information Exchange:
Turning Hype into Real Projects” (pdf)

Presented by Scott Cleary, Program Director, eHealth Connecticut

eHealth Connnecticut, designated the state’s official Health Information Exchange, according to Hartford Business, also recently joined forces with THICC (Transforming Healthcare in Connecticut Communities), a coalition of 20 hospitals, physician practices, employer groups, and insurers forming their own health information exchange.

THICC: See a September 1, 2009 story by Eric Wicklund in Healthcare IT News about the EHR setup from Allscripts that hospitals and physician organizations in THICC will subsidize.

ONC updates FAQs on HIE Coop: Oct 5-6, 2009

ONC Updates FAQs on HIE Cooperative Agreement
Frequently Asked Questions Updated as of October 6, 2009

All four sections were updated the week of October 5, 2009. ONC encourages users to check its site frequently for updates. Additional updates 10/9 and 10/13.
Main HIE Cooperative Agreement FAQ page
          Background FAQs Updated 10/5/09
          Application FAQs Updated 10/13/09
          Funding FAQs Updated 10/9/09
          Award Administration FAQs Updated 10/5/09

 The FAQs reemphasize that the total allocation by state is not dependent on whether the state is in the planning or implementation stage, but the timing of the release of funds will depend on approval of the state’s strategic and implementation plans by ONC. Timing does impact requirements for matching funds by the states.

In addition ONC explained the recent elimination of the needs based allocation from the funding formula. Each state and territory  will receive a base payment of $4 million plus an equity factor for states and DC and Puerto Rico, based on number of primary care physicians per state, number of short stay hospitals in the state, medically underserved  and rural populations (federally qualified health centers and rural health centers), and state population.

The sources for data impacting equity factors in funding allocations are also provided in the Funding FAQs.

Please check the ONC pages for the full HIE Agreement FAQs.

ONC Updates FAQs on Regional Extension Centers: Oct 1, 2009

ONC Updates FAQs on Regional Extension Centers
Frequently Asked Questions Updated as of October 1, 2009
The Funding and Application Submissions FAQs were updated on October 1, 2009. ONC encourages users to check its site frequently for updates.
Main Regional Extension Center FAQ page 
      A. BACKGROUND/GENERAL FAQs
      B. FUNDING FAQs (updated Oct 1, 2009)
      C. ELIGIBILITY FAQs
      D. APPLICATION SUBMISSION FAQs (updated Oct 1, 2009)
      E. APPLICATION REVIEW FAQs
     
F. AWARD ADMINISTRATION FAQs
      G. OTHER/MISCELLANEOUS FAQs

The Funding FAQs reiterate that for the purposes of this grant,  “10 individual priority primary-care providers” is the maximum number that will be counted in a single incorporated physician practice. A Center will only receive financial support once for a provider no matter how many locations that physician serves. Providers will be identified by a National Provider Identifier (NPI).

For previous post about FAQs, see e-Healthcare Marketing.

NJ Posts Framework for HIE Application to ONC

New Jersey Posts Framework for HIE Application to ONC
At the New Jersey HIT Commission meeting on October 1, 2009, the state presented the preliminary framework for its proposal to Office of National Coordinator (ONC) for the State Health Information Exchange (HIE) Cooperative Agreement Program application (pdf).
Presentation  (pdf)

NJ HIT Commission Page: http://www.nj.gov/health/bc/hitc.shtml

The preliminary framework does not yet show how the specific HIE grant proposals made by New Jersey organizations to the state will be folded into the framework for the proposal to ONC. It was noted at the commission meeting that a new board, separate from the commission, would be established to govern the NJHIE. The commission would provide standards and guidance for the NJHIE board.

Several other key points in the framework include:
–Planned used cases include Accurate Patient Identification, State Databases, ePrescribing, Lab Results, Clinical Messaging Services to Provider Portals, Emergency Department/Hospital Discharge Summaries; and Chart Summaries and Radiology Reports to Emergency Departments/Hospitals/SNFs, Physicians and Clinics.
–Hybrid technology approach.
–NJHIE will provide gateway for Community HIE’s to access the national NHIN and gateway between NJ Community HIEs.
–A single Community HIE (designated NJ‐CHIE) should be developed or sponsored by the agency that operates the NJHIE. This “default,” Community HIE would provide connections for entities that have no other way to connect, and would be operated, at least on an interim basis, as an adjunct capability of the NJHIE.
–NJHIE will provide statewide Master Patient Index (MPI).
–Privacy and Security Standards.
–Kurt Salmon and Associates is updating environmental scan on HIE from NJHA plan they produced in 2007.

Presentations from Rutgers and a survey of CIOs by NJ HIMSS were also presented at the Commission meeting.

Blumenthal: ‘Meaningful’ Progress Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange

Blumenthal Letter #3: “Meaningful” Progress
Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange

A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal,
National Coordinator for Health IT 

Sent October 1, 2009:

Dr. David Blumenthal

Dr. David Blumenthal

I recently reported on our announcement of State Health Information Technology Grants and grants to establish Health Information Technology Regional Extension Centers, as authorized under the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Recovery Act).

Today I want to discuss the important term “meaningful use” of electronic health records (EHRs) – both as a concept that underlies the movement toward an electronic health care environment and as a practical set of standards that will be issued as a proposed regulation by the end of 2009.

The HITECH Act provisions of the Recovery Act create a truly historic opportunity to transform our health system through unprecedented investments in the development of a nationwide electronic health information system.  This system will ultimately help facilitate, inform, measure, and sustain improvements in the quality, efficiency, and safety of health care available to every American.  Simply put, health professionals will be able to give better care, and their patients’ experience of care will improve, leading to better health outcomes overall.

As many of you are aware, the HITECH Act provides incentive payments to doctors and hospitals that adopt and meaningfully use health information technology.  Eligible physicians, including those in solo or small practices, can receive up to $44,000 over five years under Medicare or $63,750 over six years under Medicaid for being meaningful users of certified electronic health records.  Hospitals that become meaningful EHR users could receive up to four years of financial incentive payments under Medicare beginning in 2011, and up to six years of incentive payments under Medicaid beginning in October 2010.

The HITECH Act’s financial incentives demonstrate Congress’ and the Administration’s commitment to help those who want to improve their care delivery, and will serve as a catalyst to accelerate and smooth the path to HIT adoption by more individual providers and organizations.  The dollars are tangible evidence of a national determination to bring health care into the 21st century.

The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) is charged with coordinating nationwide efforts to implement and use the most advanced health information technology and the electronic exchange of health information. ONC is working with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), through an open and transparent process, on efforts to officially designate what constitutes “meaningful use.”

ONC has already engaged in a broad range of efforts to support the development of a formal definition of meaningful use.  The HITECH Act designated a federal advisory committee, the HIT Policy Committee, with broad representation from major health care constituencies, to provide recommendations to ONC on meaningful use.  The HIT Policy Committee has provided two sets of recommendations, informed by input from a variety of stakeholders.  ONC and CMS have also conducted a series of listening sessions to solicit feedback from more than 200 representatives of various constituent groups and an open comment period where over 800 public comments were submitted and reviewed.  The second set of recommendations on meaningful use was issued at a July 16 HIT Policy Committee meeting and details can be found at healthit.hhs.gov/policycommittee.

CMS is expected to publish a formal definition of meaningful use, for the purposes of receiving the Medicare and Medicaid incentive payments, by December 31, 2009. At that time, the public will be able to comment on the definition, and such comments will be considered in reaching any final definition of the term. 

By focusing on “meaningful use,” we recognize that better health care does not come solely from the adoption of technology itself, but through the exchange and use of health information to best inform clinical decisions at the point of care.  Meaningful use of EHRs, we anticipate, will also enable providers to reduce the amount of time spent on duplicative paperwork and gain more time to spend with their patients throughout the day.  It will lead us toward improvements and sustainability of our health care system that can only be attained with the help of a reliable and secure nationwide electronic health information system.

The concept of meaningful use is simple and inspiring, but we recognize that it becomes significantly more complex at a policy and regulatory level.  As a result, we expect that any formal definition of “meaningful use” must include specific activities health care providers need to undertake to qualify for incentives from the federal government. 

Ultimately, we believe “meaningful use” should embody the goals of a transformed health system.  Meaningful use, in the long-term, is when EHRs are used by health care providers to improve patient care, safety, and quality.

What’s next? 

As stated above, the next step in our process is a notice of proposed rulemaking in late 2009 with a public comment period in early 2010.  As this process unfolds, we will continue to talk and share experiences about transitioning to EHRs, and to help deepen understanding among physicians and hospitals about the use of EHRs.  We will also present programs designed to help smooth the transition process, and identify activities physicians and hospitals can engage in now to promote adoption of EHRs.  As efforts advance, we will turn our attention to other necessary supporting programs, some of which you will hear more about in the coming weeks, including defining what constitutes a “certified” EHR, which is one of the requirements to qualify for Medicare and Medicaid incentives.

In the meantime, what can providers do to move toward becoming “meaningful users” – even in the absence of a formal definition?  Naturally, while understanding that the final definition will be adopted through a formal rulemaking process, it will be helpful to be as familiar as possible with the discussion of meaningful use criteria to date.  (You will find that information posted at healthit.hhs.gov/meaningfuluse.) 

Armed with an understanding of the discussion of meaningful use as it unfolds, providers can begin to consider how their own practices or organizations might be reshaped to enhance the efficiency and quality of care through the use of an electronic health record system.  Be assured you will not be alone as you seek to adopt an EHR system.  Through our recently announced collaborative HITECH grants programs and others to be initiated later this year, we will continue to support providers in moving forward.  Additional details about the grants are also available in my previous update and at healthit.hhs.gov/HITECHgrants.

To some providers, particularly small or already stretched physician practices or small, rural hospitals, the path toward meaningful use may still seem arduous.  To others, who would just prefer to stick with the “status quo,” it may seem like an unwanted intrusion.  We believe that the time has come for coordinated action.  The price of inaction – in adverse events, lost patient lives, delayed or improper treatments, unnecessary procedures, excessive costs, and so on – is just too high, and will only get worse. 

There is much at stake and much to do.  We must relieve the crushing burden of health care costs in this country by improving efficiency, and assuring the highest level of patient care and safety regardless of geography or demographics.  By using current technologies in a meaningful way, as well as technology to be developed in the future, we will take great strides toward solving some of the most vexing problems facing our health care system and creating a new platform for innovative solutions to health care.

I look forward to providing periodic updates, and to continued interactions with all the communities that have so much to gain from this profound transformation.

Sincerely,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services 

This letter is part of a series of ongoing updates from the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology. The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) encourages you to share this information as we work together to enhance the quality, safety and value of care and the health of all Americans through the use of electronic health records and health information technology.

For more information and to receive regular updates from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, please subscribe to our Health IT News list.

If you have difficulty viewing this message, please view it online.  To ensure that you receive future correspondence, please add this email address to your list of secure addresses.

Link to ONC site and Dr. Blumenthal’s Three Letters from August 19, 20 and October 1, 2009.

NJ HIMSS Delegation Joins National Health IT Advocacy on Capitol Hill

NJ HIMSS Delegation Joins National HIT Advocacy on Capitol Hill
Taking a pre-dawn bus to Washington, DC, Wednesday, September 24, 2009 as part of contingent of more than 40 New Jersey HIMSS chapter members with several colleagues from the Delaware Valley chapter, we joined HIMSS members from across the country visiting senators, Congressmen and their staffs.

Requesting three major initiatives (known as “Asks” on the Hill), New Jersey members visited personally with Congressmen Leonard Lance and Steve Rothman in their respective offices, and Lance’s legislative assistant Jeffrey Last, as well as a member of Congressman’s Frank Pallone’s staff and aides in other Congressional offices. On the Senate side, NJ delegations of more than 20 met with Senator Robert Menendez’s legislative correspondent Chasseny Lewis and Senator Frank Lautenberg’s legislative assistant Apryl Clark.

The “Asks”
Per quidelines supplied by HIMSS Legislative Affairs leaders
“1. Ensure that the Executive Branch meets the timelines, requirements, and the needs of your Congressional constituents for the health information technology (IT) components included in the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (ARRA).

2.  Require the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) to conduct a study concerning the necessary funding needed to achieve the nationwide exchange of health information among health information exchanges (HIEs).

3.  Apply Congressional oversight authority to ensure that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) establishes a final regulation for the e-prescribing of controlled substances that would not impede the overall benefits of e-prescribing.

To view all HIMSS position statements and legislative analyses, please visit the HIMSS website at: http://www.himss.org/advocacy ”

The Offers
Led by NJ HIMSS chapter president Richard Temple, CIO of AristaCare, members offered  their personal and chapter services
1. to answer future questions about HITECH and healthcare IT  issues and challenges, as well as

2. to offer forums for NJ members of Congress and their staffs to learn more about the IT issues facing hospitals, physicians, patients, healthcare and IT professionals.

One Congressional staffer was surprised and pleased to hear we were offering help and not just asking.

For New Jersey the Advocacy Day event was organized by Advocacy chair Indranil (Neal) Ganguly, CIO of CentraState and Events chair and bus chaperone Tony Ferrante, Director, Business Development for Computer Design and Integration. And no one was left behind.

The HITECH Process
This writer, along with colleagues from NJ HIMSS note their appreciation for the passage of the HITECH  Act with generally high expectations  for its impact on patients and healthcare. The complex process led by National Coordinator for Health IT David Blumenthal, his fellow ONC staffers and advisors, and the public and private members of the HIT Policy and Standard Committees, along with HITSP volunteers, has demonstrated to this writer remarkable momentum, transparency, and agility including responsiveness to a great deal of public feedback. CCHIT has also moved rapidly to adjust to the new certification environment.

One observes a powerful force unleashed in 2009 after a decade or two of these healthcare leaders and experts  working on their own and with each other to develop better ways to support patient care with healthcare IT, and building on a underfunded but critical structure developed under the previous administration. New Jersey and all other states and territories are increasingly focusing on in-state and local activities (Health Information Exchanges and Regional Extension Centers) under the guidance of ONC to move this process to the individual healthcare provider and patient.

The Learning
When the NJ bus arrived mid-morning Sept 23, 2009, to HIMSS 8th Annual Policy Summit at the Renaissance Washington, DC Hotel, we were fortunate to hear a very adept policy update from a member of the HIT Policy Committee, Gayle Harrell, Member of the Florida House of Representatives (2000-08). We look forward to the online posting of her presentation.

NJ Health Information Exchange Program Grants FAQs Posted

NJ Health Information Exchange Program Grants FAQs
Frequently Asked Questions Posted Sept 21, 2009

Questions and Answers, see
HTML version as of Sept 21, 2009 on e-Healthcare Marketing.
Official PDF version.

FAQ Topics Covered
1. Master Patient Index/Record Locator Service:  software purchase or integration with state MPI/RLS.
2. Division of ONC funding of NJ HIE between state and RFA applicants.
3. Composition of  multi-departmental Review Panel.
4. NJ HIE Program Grants matching formula.
5. Number of budget years.
6. Retroactive expenditures.
7. Delayed consensus on sustainability mechanisms.
8. Definition of availability of ‘real-time’ data.
9. Definition of Regional HIE not necessarily geographic.
10. Timing of “Statement of Local Governmental Public Health Partnership.”
11. Current level of implementation.

For full FAQs Questions and Answers:
HTML version as of Sept 21, 2009 on e-Healthcare Marketing.
Official PDF version.

For additional information, see previous post on e-Healthcare Marketing.
Add info and links will be added.