NHIN Workgroup of HIT Policy Cmte Public Hearing: Dec 16, 2009

The HIT Policy Committee’s NHIN Workgroup 
Public Hearing: Wed, Dec 16, 2009
10 am to 1 pm/Eastern Time
Excerpted from email announcement 12/9/09.

Topic for discussion: Directory Services and Certificates
NOTE: The Workgroup will go into CLOSED SESSION at 1:15 pm/Eastern Time. 

Public Dial-in Number:  (877) 709-8152
Webcast:  http://altarum.na3.acrobat.com/HITpolicy

Agenda
Wednesday, December 16, 2009 – 10:00 am to 1:00 pm [Eastern Time]
Omni Shoreham Hotel, 2500 Calvert Street, NW, Washington, DC

  • 10:00 a.m. Call to Order – Judy Sparrow, Office of the National Coordinator
  • 10:05 a.m. Level Setting & Review of Objectives
    • Farzad Mostashari, Office of the National Coordinator
    • David Lansky, Chair
    • Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair
  • 10:20 a.m. Summary of Approaches for NHIN Meaningful Use in 2011 & Components of the NHIN
    • Farzad Mostashari, Office of the National Coordinator
  • 10:40 a.m. Testimony from SureScripts
    • Rick Ratliff [invited]
  • 11:00 a.m. Testimony from Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare
    • Robin Thomashauer [invited]
  • 11.20 p.m. Testimony from Emdeon
    • Khris Olberg [invited]
  • 11.40 p.m. Testimony from Social Security Administration
    • James Borland
  • 12:00 p.m. Testimony from Federation of State Medical Boards [invited]
    • Martin Crane, Chair or
    • Humayun Chaudhry, President and Chief Executive Officer
  • 12:20 p.m. Public Comments
  • 12:50 p.m. Summary and Closing
    • Farzad Mostashari, Office of the National Coordinator
    • David Lansky, Chair
    • Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair
  • 1:00 p.m. PUBLIC MEETING ADJOURN
  • 1:15 p.m. CLOSED WORKGROUP SESSION
    5:00 p.m. ADJOURN

END OF EMAIL ANNOUNCMENT

ONC NHIN RESOURCE PAGE:  UPDATED DECEMBER 2009
    Data Use and Recipricol Support Agreement (DURSA) (pdf)
NHIN Tomorrow

See an earlier post prior to NHIN meeting on Nov 20, 2009 and related information from e-Healthcare Marketing.

ONC and eHI Rev Up Consumer Focus on Health IT

ONC recruits Consumer Engagement Expert Joshua Seidman;
eHealth Initiative Takes Over IxAction Alliance

Diane Manos of HealthcareIT News reported on November 24, 2009, “The eHealth Initiative (eHI) is taking over the Information Therapy Action (IxAction) Alliance, a group that focuses on patient-centered care and health information technology.” The IxAction Alliance and its Web sites will maintain their identities while being managed by eHI.

eHealth Initiative stated in a November 24, 2009 press release “eHI’s adoption of the IxAction Alliance, which was previously operated by the Center for Information Therapy (IxCenter), comes on the heels of the announcement that the IxCenter will be ceasing operations as its founder and president, Joshua Seidman, PhD, moves to the federal Office of the National Coordinator of Health Information Technology to help lead government efforts around consumer engagement and the meaningful use of electronic health records. eHI will also absorb the intellectual property of the IxCenter.”

Jennifer Covich Bordenick, Chief Operating Officer of the eHealth Initiative said “eHI will be able leverage its broad-based membership spanning every sector of the healthcare community and its leadership in using health information technology to drive improvements in healthcare as a means to expand the reach and impact of the IxAction Alliance.”

Seidman’s Transition Post on Center for Information Therapy Blog:
“Meaningful Use, ONC, Ix, and Me”

Joushua Seidman presented an 8-year history of Center for Information Therapy, their accomplishments, the commitment of ONC and eHI to consumer focus, and the transitions of iXAlliance and iXCenter to eHI in his November 18, 2009 post.

The boiler-plate descriptions of eHI and iXAction Alliance taken from the eHI press release:
About eHealth Initiative and its Foundation
“The eHealth Initiative (eHI) is an independent, non-profit, multi-stakeholder organization whose mission is to drive improvements in the quality, safety, and efficiency of health care through information and information technology. eHI engages multiple stakeholders including clinicians, consumer and patient groups, employers and healthcare purchasers, health IT suppliers, health plans, hospitals and other providers, laboratories, pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, pharmacies, public health agencies, and state and community-based organizations, to reach agreement on and drive the adoption of common principles, policies, strategies and actions that improve the quality, safety and efficiency of health care through information technology that are responsible, practical, sustainable, responsible to stakeholder needs—particularly those of patients–and build and maintain the public’s trust. For more information, visit http://www.ehealthinitiative.org.”

About the IxAction Alliance
“The IxAction Alliance is an alliance of organizations committed to stimulating innovation and diffusing best practices and to evolving critical Ix strategies with the goal of advancing the practice and science of information therapy in order to improve the quality and efficiency of health care delivery. The IxAction Alliance envisions a future for our healthcare system in which every health decision made collaboratively by patients and providers is an informed one.  For more information, visit http://www.ixaction.org.”

eHI Web site
http://www.ehealthinitiative.org
iXCenter Web sites
http://www.ixcenter.org 
http://www.ixaction.org

eHI Members
eHI Board Members   
iX Board Members

Pennsylvania HIE (PHIX) Releases Strategic Plan; Leverages Delaware HIE (DHIN)

Pennsylvania HIE Releases Strategic Program;
Leverages Delaware HIE (DHIN)
Pennsylvania Health Information Exchange (PHIX) released its strategic plan (pdf)  for public comment last week in conjunction with Pennsylviania’s (Medicaid) Medical Assistance HIT Plan, which was released November 17, 2009. The PHIX plan proposes to “piggyback” on the highly-touted Delaware Health Information Network’s (DHIN) “existing contract for a proven technical platform which is based on interoperable standards. The DHIN platform is scalable to Pennsylvania’s needs and capable of handling the policies and procedures specific to Pennyslvania’s legal requirements independent of Delaware’s requirements.”

“The DHIN platform offers health systems and hospitals the ability to use edge-server technology where their data is houses remotely on a secure drive under their control. In this model the relevant data is uploaded to the edge server and is available for health care provider inquiries. The advantage of this architecture is faster response time and the ability ot exchange data without touching or impacting a health system or hospital information system.”  The plan anticipates saving as much as 12 to 18 months in implementation time, immediately leveraging the infrastrucure on which DHIN has already invested $20 million, and building on “operational policies, procedures, and relationships with vendors’ developed by DHIN.”

PHIX expects an allocation of $17.1 million in HIE grant funding from ONC, and the state has already committed $1 million. Public comments for the PHIX plan are due by December 20, 2009. The Medical Assistance HIT program will launch a listening tour around the state this year and in 2010.

Medical Assistance HIT Program Information for Stakeholders
Excerpted from PA Dept. of Public Welfare
Information For Consumers
“The MA Health IT Initiative will have a huge impact on a consumer’s experience in the health care system. The MA Health It Initiative is designed to empower the patient and provide them access to their own health care information. The initiative is also designed to improve communications between patients and providers allowing for easier follow up on recommended care, quick updates of new health status information and greater accountability for care for both the provider and the patient.

“Some of the main features of the initiative include:

  • E-Prescribing which is aimed at reducing patient wait times at pharmacies and in decreasing adverse drug interactions
  • Electronic referrals streamline process and eliminate paper forms
  • Reduced need to provide medical information and history multiple times
  • Possible life saving medical information available in an emergency situation
  • Access information in their own electronic health record”
Information for Hospitals
“Hospital and Health System providers will find that the MA Health IT Initiative will help in efforts to improve the quality of care and implement cost containment measures.

Improve Communication
“This includes communications between health care providers and with patients.Features of this program include:

  • Increased ability to document communication with patients
  • Enhanced ability to outreach to patients regarding both preventative care and adherence to chronic care needs

E-Prescribing
“This would allow providers to send prescriptions to pharmacies in electronic format. E-Prescribing will help to:

  • Reduce errors due to deciphering handwriting
  • Create and instant record of prescriptions to check for drug interactions
  • Reduce patients responsibility in obtaining prescriptions

Ordering Tests and Referrals
“The initiative would allow providers the ability to order tests and send referrals electronically. This would benefits providers by:

  • Reducing Paperwork
  • Automating referrals to reduce administrative error
  • Expediting the process of returning results, which could also be sent electronically

“In addition, implementing EHR’s and other forms of Health IT will increase access to immediate decision support tools like clinical guidelines, reduce staff time spent on administrative tasks, reduce time spent charting patient information, and allow providers and health care facilities the ability to make back-up copies of a patients medical history in case of emergencies or natural disasters.”

Pennsylvania HIT Plans
GOHCR (Governor’s Office of Health Care Reform)
PA Health Information Exchange (PHIX) Proposed Strategic Plan Nov 2009 (pdf)

PA (Medicaid) Medical Assistance HIT Program:
PA Medical Assistance HIT Initiative Web site
PA MA HIT Proposal: Transforming Health Care Delivery Through the Use of Information Technology: Vision and Goals of the MA Health IT Initative in Pennsylvania  (pdf) included within PHIX proposal
PA Medical Assistance HIT Proposal Slides

Chopra, HL7, Consultant Shirky Speak in New Post to ONC Blog

Aneesh Chopra, Charles Jaffe of HL7, Consultant Clay Shirky Add News Posts to ONC Blog
In preparation for today’s November 19, 2009 HIT Standards Committee meeting, three posts went up this morning on ONC FACA Blog:
Aneesh Chopra Reflects on Progress to Date & What is to Come
Over 200 posts came in on open forum of FACA Blog, and Chopra gives much needed direction to organize future posts: “Our original intention was to seek public input on the work of the HIT Standards Committee to “pull forward” adoption. We identified seven topics (Standards, Interoperability, Vocabularies, Privacy, Security, Quality and Implementation Case Studies) to help frame the discussion. If you would like to comment on these seven topics, please start your comment by identifying the topic to which you are responding (i.e. “Vocabularies. Drawing from my experiences …”). Your self-categorization will help us to better organize and utilize your feedback.”

Two Articles on Real World Experience Published on Chopra post
Jaffe of HL7 Proposes Free Licensing of HL7
“H7 Proposal Reduces Barriers to HIE”

Charles Jaffe, CEO of HL7 writes “We have submitted a proposal to HHS that would allow the licensing of HL7 intellectual property (including the standards and the supporting technology) free of charge for use in the United States.”

Clay Shirky, Consultant
“What will make the difference in getting standards right for broadest meaningful use?”

Shirky concludes his article “Imagining a network simple enough that a small practice can participate in basic transactions has the downside of being less than perfect. It will not deliver a Big Bang, in which participants suddenly operate with complete technical flexibility and semantic clarity. In place of perfection, however, a minimally necessary approach to standards would have one significant upside: it might actually work.”

New NHIN Work Group to Meet Nov 20, 2009: Nationwide Health Information Network

New Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) Work Group to Meet November 20, 2009
According to the ONC site, accessed on November 19, 2009,
a new NHIN Workgroup will hold its first meeting on November 20, 2009. As the NHIN Tomorrow Web page describes “A NHIN Work Group (a new work group under the HIT Policy Committee) is being formed to offer recommendations on creating a policy and technical framework that allows the internet to be used for the secure and standards-based exchange of health information, in a way that is open to all and fosters innovation.”

“At a very high level, the new NHIN Work Group will hold discussions on how to use the internet to transform healthcare, including network security and access to health information. At the inaugural meeting on November 20, the work group will review and refine the charge and initial activities, including:

  • Establishing an incremental approach that will generate immediate value (e.g., enable providers to achieve meaningful use) while creating the components that will be needed for more advanced information exchange (e.g., broadcast query).
  • Describing the governance mechanism required for above.
  • Providing recommendations to the HIT Policy and HIT Standards Committees.”

“The Nationwide Health Information Network (NHIN) is a key component of the nationwide health information technology strategy and will provide a common platform for health information exchange across diverse entities, within communities and across the country, helping to achieve the goals of the HITECH Act. The NHIN Tomorrow will mature to enable the goals specified in the HITECH act.” 

Related Blogs, Documents, and Information
Blogs on NHIN
Wes Rishel and David Kibbe exchange blog posts on NHIN
Rishel: “Semi-Agreeing with David Kibbe” Nov 18, 2009
Kbbe Klepper:  “The Health Internet vs. the NHIN — A Matter of Control, Cost, and Timing” Nov 16, 2009
Rishel: “Health 2.0: Take a Lesson from the Web” Nov 18, 2009

Governance of the Operational Nationwide Health Information Network: Functions and Activities (pdf)
Submitted by: National eHealth Collaborative NHIN Governance Framework Planning Working Group on June 26, 2009.
According to National eHealth Collaborative, “In November 2008, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and the National eHealth Collaborative (NeHC) established the NHIN Governance Framework Planning Workgroup to understand the governance needs of the NHIN. On June 26, 2009, the Workgroup transmitted a white paper to ONC laying out a suggested conceptual framework for long-term governance of the NHIN.” 

ONC Awards NHIN bridge contract to Nitor Group
According to WashingtonTechnology‘s Alice Lipowicz reporting on November 11, 2009, “Nitor will help move health information network toward production” during an interim period when there will be open competitive bidding process for a contract to move NHIN to full production.

HealthData Management quoted from the Federal Notice on November 10, 2009.

Federal Notice on FedBizOpps.Gov

ONC Adds ‘Information Exchange’ FAQ Section to State HIE Coop Agreeement FAQs

Information Exchange FAQ Added to ONC’s
FAQs on State HIE Cooperative Agreement Programs

[updated 11/12/09]
(e-Healthcare Marketing Note: This new FAQ section, Information Exchange,  focuses on the necessity of eliminating barriers to information exchange. The following is produced in full as of 11/14/09. ONC recommends checking FAQs frequently.)

E3.  How does information exchange support the goals of the HITECH Act?

The HITECH Act seeks to improve patient care and make it patient-centric through the creation of a secure, interoperable nationwide health information network. A key premise is that information should follow the patient, and artificial obstacles — technical, bureaucratic, or business related — should not be a barrier to the seamless exchange of information. Therefore, secure information exchange needs to occur across institutional and business boundaries so that the appropriate information is available to improve coordination, efficiency, and quality of care.

E2.  How does the HITECH Act address barriers to information exchange?

Commercial barriers.
  The HITECH Act calls for the “development of a nationwide health information technology infrastructure that allows for the electronic use and exchange of information and that…promotes a more effective marketplace, greater competition…[and] increased consumer choice” among other goals.  (PHSA, Section 3001(b))   It does not support arrangements that restrict for business or proprietary purposes the secure, private exchange of information required for patient care.  Consumers, patients and their caretakers should not feel locked into a single health system or exchange arrangement because it does not to permit or encourage the sharing of information.

Economic barriers.  The HITECH Act provides incentives for providers and hospitals for the meaningful use of electronic health records (EHRs). Although the official definition of “Meaningful Use” is still in development, the HITECH Act specifically highlights “information exchange” as one requirement for the incentives.  

Technical barriers.  The HITECH Act focuses on “interoperability,” meaning that policies, programs, and incentives must aim for EHR software and systems that can share information with other EHR software and systems. To support this, HHS will invest in the infrastructure to “support the nationwide electronic exchange and use of health information …including connecting health information exchanges…” HHS works with all partners in the health care and health IT industries to develop the technologies and policies to deliver information securely, privately, and accurately to whomever needs to see it on behalf of the patient’s health. 

E1.  What role do the State Health Information Exchange Cooperative Agreements Program and the Health Information Technology Extension Program play in supporting this goal?

The state health information exchange program authorized in HITECH Section 3013, totaling $564 million, will support states and state-designated entities to advance mechanisms for information sharing across the health care system. It targets information exchange across boundaries, not only within each state but explicitly as part of a nationwide framework.  These grantees’ activities must support interoperability that lets patient data follow the patient across political and geographic boundaries.  The extension program authorized in HITECH 3012, totaling $693 million, will provide technical assistance, guidance and information on best practices to support and accelerate health care providers’ efforts to become meaningful users of EHRs.  The national Health Information Technology Research Center and the Regional Extensions Centers will help providers establish interoperable EHRs and implement the health information exchange requirements for the incentives.

Main HIE Cooperative Agreement FAQ page
          Background FAQs Updated 10/5/09
          Application FAQs Updated 10/20/09
          Funding FAQs Updated 10/9/09
          Award Administration FAQs Updated 10/5/09
          
Information Exchange FAQs Added 11/12/09

Blumenthal at HIE Summit: “Information is the lifeblood of medicine”

Blumenthal at HIE Summit:
“Information is the lifeblood of medicine”;
To meet with Alvarez of Canada Health Infoway
Declaring ”Information is the lifeblood of medicine,” National Coordinator of Health IT David Blumenthal spoke before 200+ participants at The College of Physicians of  Philadelphia on November 10, 2009. Blumenthal was continuing his six-month campaign to transform medical practice in the US, speaking at the site of the oldest professional medical society in America and the location for the Health Information Exchange Summit sponsored by the Consulate of Canada and its trade commissioner Vincent Finn.

“Practioners are only as good as their information to make a decision,” Blumenthal maintained. As a primary care physician for 30 years, Blumenthal said it’s “the vision of improved care that informs our policy,” not the implementation of technology.

Richard Alvarez, President & CEO of Canada Health Infoway, equivalent to the US Office of National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC), spoke of his goal of using innovative technology to improve health care delivery with the intention of achieving EHRs for 50% of Canadians by 2010. While a recent national report found that Infoway faced major challenges in reaching that goal (current implementation is 17%), Canada’s Auditor General wrote “Infoway has accomplished much in the eight years since its creation.”

Blumenthal told how he looked forward to meeting with Alvarez to compare notes in the near future and learn from Canada’s experience. Several other Canadian HIT leaders shared their experiences as well.

In addition, privacy and security, interoperability and meaningful use, and HIE sustainability were discussed by three panels of leading area and national leaders. Some highlights from these panels will be summarized in a later post.

Two days before releasing ONC’s fourth letter to the public, this one on information exchange, Blumenthal alluded to two key aspects that are still in the planning stages–a workforce transformation initiative to train as many as 50,000 people to assist in EHR implementation and an initiative on clinical decision support (CDS) sytems.  Closed two-day stakeholder workshop meetings were held in August to inform the direction of each of these initiatives, and reported on recently in e-Healthcare Marketing.

The HIE Summit was produced in conjuntion with Pennsylvania eHealth Initiative (PAeHI) led by Executive Director Mark Stevens. PAeHI’s mission is to provide leadership in the use of information technology to improve healthcare quality. Additional local partners included HIMSS Delaware Valley Chapter and AHIMA Foundation. Seventeen of 23 exhibitors were Canadian Health IT firms seeking business in the US.

Consulate of Canada: www.philadelphia.gc.ca
PAeHI: www.paehi.org
Canada Health Infoway: www.infoway-inforoute.ca
Office of Nat’l Coordinator of Health IT:  http://healthit.hhs.gov
The College of Physicians of Philadelphia: www.collphyphil.org
DV HIMSS: www.dvhimss.org
AHIMA Foundation: http://www.ahimafoundation.org/
PHIMA (PA version of AHIMA): http://phima.org

See Dr. Blumenthal’s November 12, 2009 Letter (#4) to the Public about Information Exchange on previous e-Healthcare Marketing post.

Blumenthal Letter #4: The HITECH Foundation for Information Exchange

Blumenthal Issues Fourth Update in Series:
The HITECH Foundation for Information Exchange
Sent by email November 12, 2009 and available on ONC site:
November 12, 2009
A Message from Dr. David Blumenthal, National Coordinator for Health Information Technology

As the many activities mandated by the HITECH Act move forward, I want to take a moment to share my vision of the overarching goal and some of its implications.  Our goal, above all else, is to make care better for patients, and to make it patient-centered.  Information policy and health IT policy should serve that goal. 

A key premise: information should follow the patient, and artificial obstacles – technical, business related, bureaucratic – should not get in the way.  As a doctor, I have many times wanted access to data that I knew were buried in the computers or paper records of another health system across town.  Neither my care nor my patients were well served in those instances.  That is what we must get beyond.  That is the goal we will pursue, and it will inform all our policy choices now and going forward.  This means that information exchange must cross institutional and business boundaries.  Because that is what patients need.  Exchange within business groups will not be sufficient – the goal is to have information flow seamlessly and effortlessly to every nook and cranny of our health system, when and where it is needed, just like the blood within our arteries and veins meets our bodies’ vital needs.

If we are to reap the benefit of information exchange, Americans must also be assured that the most advanced technology and proven business practices will be employed to secure the privacy and security of their personal health information, both within and across electronic systems, and that persons and organizations who hold personal health data are trustworthy custodians of the information.  We must have comprehensive, clear, and sustainable policies that strengthen existing protections, fill gaps as they emerge, fortify new opportunities for patients’ access to and control of their information, and align with evolving technologies.  I will devote a separate letter to this critical issue and the many activities mandated by the HITECH Act that we are developing.

On the question of exchange, however, the HITECH Act is pretty specific about eliminating inappropriate barriers. 

It squarely tackles the commercial barriers.  The HITECH Act calls for the “development of a nationwide health information technology infrastructure that allows for the electronic use and exchange of information and that…promotes a more effective marketplace, greater competition…[and] increased consumer choice” among other goals.  (Section 3001(b))  This means we cannot support arrangements that restrict the secure, private exchange of information required for patient care across provider or network boundaries.  Some of these arrangements may improve care for those inside their walls.  But ultimately, they have the potential to carve the nation up into disconnected silos of information, and thus, to undermine the vision of a secure, interoperable, nationwide health information infrastructure, which the law requires us to establish.  Consumers, patients and their caretakers should never feel locked into a single health system or exchange arrangement because it does not permit or encourage the sharing of information.

It tackles the economic barriers.  The HITECH Act incentives for providers and hospitals are powerful tools.  While the official definition of “Meaningful Use” won’t be finalized until next year, the HITECH Act specifically highlights “information exchange” as one requirement for the incentives.  

It tackles the technical barriers.  The HITECH Act focuses on “interoperability” or “interoperable products.”  In plain English, this means that our policies, programs, and incentives must aim for electronic health record (EHR) software and systems that can share information with different EHRs and networks so that information can follow patients wherever they go.  And to build the pipelines to carry this information, HHS is directed to invest in the infrastructure to “support the nationwide electronic exchange and use of health information …including connecting health information exchanges…”  (Section 3011)  This means we will work with all our partners in the health and IT industries and with organizations that are committed to information sharing to develop the technologies and policies that can help us deliver information securely, privately, and accurately to whomever needs to see it on behalf of the patient’s health.  We must ensure interoperability for the future.

It provides building blocks for information exchange across jurisdictions.  The grants for states and state-designated entities in Section 3013 – which will total $564 million – target information exchange across boundaries, not only within each state but explicitly as part of a nationwide framework.  We will start announcing the awards this winter.  These grantees’ activities must support interoperability that lets patient data follow the patient across political and geographic boundaries.  The grantees will be our partners in building the nationwide infrastructure mentioned previously. 

In short, the HITECH Act not only authorizes but requires us to mobilize all our policies, programs, and incentives to give the American people the patient-centric care they deserve and expect.
 
I look forward to engaging all our partners in this unique opportunity.

Regards,

David Blumenthal, M.D., M.P.P.
National Coordinator for Health Information Technology
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services

Updates from the National Coordinator for Health Informtation Technology
#1 Aug 19, 2009: Electronic Health Records and the 21st Century Health System
#2 Aug 20, 2009: News on Next Steps Toward Nationwide Health Information Exchange
#3 Oct 1, 2009: “Meaningful” Progress Toward Electronic Health Information Exchange
#4 Nov 12, 2009: The HITECH Foundation for Information Exchange

Footnotes from Dr. David Blumenthal Letter:
The Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) encourages you to share this information as we work together to enhance the quality, safety and value of care and the health of all Americans through the use of electronic health records and health information technology.

For more information and to receive regular updates from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, please subscribe to our Health IT News list.

If you have difficulty viewing this message, please
view it online.  
 

HIE Overview Video from Kansas, Useful for All States

HIE Overview Video from Kansas, Useful for All States
The Kansas e-Health Advisory Council saw an HIE Overview presentation on November 6, 2009,
that was posted earlier this week on the Kansas Health Information Technology Initiative site. The 45-minute presentation (with additional 15 minutes Q&A) appears quite informative for both novices and those involved more closely in the HIE world. Reminded that information exchange is a verb, and that Health Information Organization (HIO) is the entity that governs exchange.

Overview was produced by Greg Smith, instructor at Kansas State University and Greg Smith & Associates, who works on health issues and community health issues in rural communities; and Joe Brisson, of HIT Associates, who has guided HIE implementations at local, state, and federal levels, including a year leading Nationwide Health Information Network Trial Demonstrations under ONC.

Kansas HIT Initiative Multimedia Page
HIE Overview Webinar (wmv)
HIE Overview Slides (ppt)

The Kansas Web site is still in the building stage.

House Health Care Reform Bill includes Health IT Measures

“Affordable Health Care for America Act” (AHCAA) includes Health IT Measures
Bernie Monegain, of Healthcare IT News reported on November 9, 2009, on response of Medical Group Management Association (large and small practices), AMA, and insurance industry to the Health IT and other aspects of bill.
Joseph Goedert, HealthData Management, reports on November 9, 2009, the bill retains ”administrative simplification language to make more uniform the HIPAA transaction sets for claims and related transactions.”

Original summary from e-Healthcare Marketing, Nov 8, 2009: The 1990-page healthcare reform bill (US H.R. 3962), passed by the US House of Representatives late on November 7, 2009, includes several references to Health Information Technology, Electronic Health Records, Health Information Exchange, and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT.  Based on an initial scan, this post notes several of those health IT references and serves as a basis for a more thorough review. Comments, additions, and corrections are invited. Page numbers intended to indicate location in pdf file where the Health IT term is shown.

State Health Access Program Grants/Standardize Electronic Administrative Actions (p. 83)
Programs to “expand access to affordable health care coverage for the uninsured population in the State” in programs such as state insurance exchanges, community coverage program, reinsurance plan program, transparent marketplace program, automated enrollment program, innovative stratgies, and purchasing collaboratives.” Administrative Electronic Transactions need to be standardized by HIT Policy and Standards Committees in conjunction with ONC.

Study and Report on Methods to Increase EHR Use
by Small Healthcare Providers
  (p. 153)
Study and report on impact of options to increase use of EHRs such as higher reimbursement, promoting lower cost EHRs (including VA’s VisTa), EHR training, or implementation assistance.

Integration of Physician Quality Reporting and EHR Reporting (p. 407)
HHS Secretary to develop plan to integrate clinical reporting on quality measures relating to meaningful use of EHRs for a patient’s health and to identify gaps in quality and coordination of care.

Institute of Medicine Study of Geographic Variation in Health Care Spending and Promoting High-Value Health Care (p. 505)
IOM to recommend changes for Medicare per capita payments considering 9 elements, including “leveraging the use of health information technology.” 

Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research (p. 756)
Housed in Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ), Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research, will “conduct, support, and synthesize research…with respect to outcomes, effectiveness, and appropriateness of health services and procedures…” including pharmaceuticals, medical devices, medical and surgical procedures, and other medical interventions.” This will involve the use of registries, research data networks from electronic health records, and other electronic health data. The Center will diseminate the information to physicians and EHR vendors to “assist the users of health information technology focused on clinical decision support  to promote the timely incorporation of such findings into clinical practices and promote the ease of use of such incorporation.”

Public Reporting by Hospitals and Ambulatory Surgical Centers on Health Care-Associated Infections (p. 914)
Transmission of this information to be coordinated with ONC and Centers for Disease Control with systems established by HITECH act.

Improving Accountability for Approved Medical Residency Training (p. 943)
Training medical residents for meaningful use for improved patient care and increased quality of the health of the community.

Implementation of Best Practices in the Delivery of Healthcare: Center for Quality Improvement (p. 1324)
Center for Quality Improvement to be charged with identifying, developing, and implementing standards “for health information technology used in the collection and reporting if quality information (including for purposes of the demonstration of meaningful use of certified electronic health record (EHR) technologu by physicians and hospitals under the Medicare program…” 

Assistant Secretary for Health Information (p. 1335)
This new position will be responsible for collecting and reporting on key health indicators regarding the “Nation’s health and the performance of the Nation’s health care.” Will coordinate with “the head of the Office of National Coordinator for Health Information Technology to ensure optimal use of health information technology.”

Community-Based Collaborative Care Network Program (p. 1447)
One of the programs to expand access to healthcare, this one is focused on  reducing unnecessary use of emergency departments through a ”health information technology network to track patients across collaborative networks.”

National Medical Device Registry: Electronic Exchange and Use in Certified Electronic Health Records of Unique Device Indentifiers (UID) (p. 1509)
This amends the Food, Drug and Cosmetics Act to “establish a national medical device registry …to facilitate analysis of postmarket safety and outcomes data on each covered device.” While there may be exceptions, each covered device is to be identified by “type, model, and serial number or other unique identifier,” and indicated in EHRs and via information exchange.

Health Service for Urban Indians (p. 1877)
Grants to support health information technology to improve individual and community health of Urban Indians.

“Affordable Health Care for America Act” (1990 pages):
 (AHCAA) US H.R. 3962  (pdf)